Standardising Outcomes in Paediatric Clinical Trials
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Standardising Outcomes in Paediatric Clinical Trials
Whether decisions about the health care of children are made by parents, carers, health practitioners, or children themselves, ideally these decisions will be informed by the results of systematic reviews of previous clinical trials. Unfortunately, drawing on research from the past when making these decisions is not straightforward, even with the advent of systematic reviews, because different ...
متن کاملStandardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Introduction Fifteen years ago, what was to become OMERACT met for the first time in The Netherlands to discuss ways in which the multitude of outcomes in assessments of the effects of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis might be standardised. In Trials, Tugwell et al have described the need for, and success of, this initiative [1] and Cooney and colleagues have set out their plans for a corres...
متن کاملClinical Trials in Paediatric Oncology
Childhood and adolescent cancers are rare diseases. Despite the progress in treatment (more than two-thirds of all cases are cured), cancer remains the leading cause of death by disease in children older than 1 year. Access to new drugs that are more efficacious or better tolerated is therefore an important public health priority. The objective of our round table was thus to take inventory of t...
متن کاملInformed consent for paediatric clinical trials in Europe
OBJECTIVE Paediatric clinical trials are often conducted as multinational trials. Informed consent or assent is part of the ethics committee approval for clinical trials. The consent requirements vary between countries due to national laws and regulations, which are not harmonised in Europe. These discrepancies can present challenges for paediatric clinical trials. The aim of this study was to ...
متن کاملEvaluation of Clinical Trials
In a number of important clinical issues such as evaluation of the efficacy or effectiveness of therapeutic or preventive interventions as well as for comparing the harms of interventions, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the highest levels of evidence, either directly or indirectly. It is obvious that critical appraisal of these studies to assess their validity and precision is of p...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: PLoS Medicine
سال: 2008
ISSN: 1549-1676
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050102